August 2003
Vol. 1, No. 2
TeamResearch News summarizes the latest information from studies or articles on business teams, along with guidance on how to apply that research in your workplace. It is published the first weekend of each month as a free service from TeamTrainersTM Consulting (www.suddenteams.com), with announcements sent by e-mail to subscribers.
This newsletter is a basic HTML file, giving you control over the appearance through your Web browser's options. See our site's newsletter page for details about the newsletter; cautions regarding research studies and business studies; and our Anti-Spam/Privacy policy.
Study/Article: In a survey, 555 nurses rated:
The harder the job, the more important job control was in keeping these nurses from getting tired. In harder jobs, either higher job control or higher support (or both) was a major plus for worker motivation. And feelings of high job support seemed to raise motivation, regardless of job demands or control, and may have reduced fatigue.
Application: Managers of workers under heavy workloads should give up as much control as possible over how the worker does the job, to reduce the mistakes, burnout, and productivity problems caused by fatigue and low motivation. The researchers suggest "giving groups...discretion over day-to-day operational decisions as well as input into the running of their groups"; giving workers say over their work situations, methods, and pace; and delegating authority for many decisions supervisors now make. At all job levels, improving teamwork and training workers about support systems (such as intranets or HR support) may help workers stay excited about their jobs.
Source: Van Yperen, N., and M. Hagedoorn (03),?Do High Job Demands Increase Intrinsic Motivation or Fatigue or Both? The Role of Job Control and Job Social Support,? Academy of Management Journal 46(3):339.
Study: Hong Kong researchers looked at the conditions that make it easier for workers to accept a system basing at least part of the workers' pay on team successes. They sent questionnaires to employees in Hong Kong and the United States of a petrochemical firm. Whether someone was comfortable with team pay was affected heavily by whether the person thought the process was fair and the team performance goals required to raise their pay could be achieved. Hong Kong workers were generally more receptive to team-based pay. Although the study was small (67 HK and 40 US respondents), its findings are in line with earlier research.
Application: Experts believe tying part of team members' pay to team success should help the team succeed, but how such a plan is implemented makes a big difference in whether it works. The more you can involve the team in establishing the process by which team pay is allocated and in the goals the team must achieve, the more likely each of those are to be perceived as fair. This in turn means the actual pay amounts are more likely to be seen as fair. In multinational teams, be aware that workers in an individual-oriented country like the United States usually resist pay for teaming more than others. Being upfront about this can reduce the odds of other team members seeing resistance as poor teamwork.
Source: Fong, S., and M. Shaffer (03), ?The Dimensionality and Determinants of Pay Satisfaction: A Cross-Cultural Investigation of a Group Incentive Plan,? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(4):559.
Article: On-the-job training (OJT) is vital for training new employees, cross-training, and keeping skills fresh. This article stated that Diane Walter of Human Performance Applications (www.teamojt.com) has come up with a method she says is relatively inexpensive and much faster than having one or two subject-matter-experts (SMEs) handle the task. She says OJT can be more effective if training materials are created by a team. This also offers the benefit of addressing other performance issues that come up in the process.
Application: The basic steps the article outlines are:
Disclaimer: TeamTrainers has no relationship with or other knowledge of Human Performance Applications.
Source: ?Eight Steps to Better On-the-Job Training,? HRfocus 80(7):11.
Study: Business success stories heard by word-of-mouth or through articles and presentations usually focus on successes instead of failures. Plus, these stories point out extreme successes and failures, as opposed to the majority of firms that perform well enough to survive (or don't) but not to the extreme that they gain special attention. Since you cannot observe the ongoing operations of a failed company, you cannot test theories about a failure yourself. And the techniques highlighted in the stories may not have had anything to do with the success or failure. In fact, "successful" techniques may have been highly risky and have failed in most cases. The researcher points out three popular management concepts that could be myths created by this bias:
Application: Although not mentioning teams per se, this study makes an important point about where and how you get the information you put to use in your workplace, including team information. If you are betting your team's success on a technique, you're better off using one that has withstood the tests of time and scientific questioning than the latest fad. See "About Business Stories" on the TeamTrainers Web site for questions to ask yourself when you hear or read these stories.
Source: Denrell, J. (03), ?Vicarious Learning, Undersampling of Failure, and the Myths of Management,? Organization Science 14(3):227.
Experts have found a wide range of business challenges that don?t seem team-related, yet are caused or can be reduced by improved teamwork, such as: low productivity and quality; low customer or employee satisfaction; and high costs, absenteeism, or turnover. If you aren?t positive your work group is as productive and cost-effective as possible, you may be throwing away money for no reason. Contact TeamTrainers today to find out.
Plain-text e-mail announcements are mailed to subscribers whenever a new issue is posted, containing a list of that month's studies and articles and a link to the newsletter. To:
Your questions and suggestions are always welcome. Contact:
Jim Morgan
Head Coach, TeamTrainers Consulting
(425)
823-5082
jim@suddenteams.com
www.suddenteams.com
All content in this newsletter is Copyright 2003 by Jim Morgan dba TeamTrainers Consulting. All rights reserved.
?SuddenTeams? is a registered trademark (US Trademark #2,456,849) and ?TeamTrainers? and ?The Science of Teams? are trademarks of Jim Morgan dba TeamTrainers Consulting.
TeamTrainers Consulting makes no guarantee or warranty regarding the use of information in this newsletter by individuals not employed by or under contract to TeamTrainers Consulting and performing official TeamTrainers business.